Lawecki Lukasz
Effectiveness
Personal Bests
| Result | Date | Competition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snatch | 135.00 | 2024-06-28 | POL |
| C&J | 167.00 | 2024-06-28 | POL |
| Total | 302.00 | 2024-06-28 | POL |
Competition history
| Date | Type | # | Weight | Sn1 | Sn2 | Sn3 | MAX Sn | Pl Sn | CJ1 | CJ2 | CJ3 | MAX CJ | Pl CJ | Total | Pl. Total | Sinclair |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-28 | POL | Ciechanów | 87.2 | 130 | 135 | 139 | 135 | 3 | 160 | 164 | 167 | 167 | 2 | 302 | 3 | 368.75 |
| 2022-11-04 | POL | Nowy Tomyśl | 80.2 | 125 | 129 | 133 | 129 | 3 | 158 | 163 | 163 | 163 | 3 | 292 | 3 | 372.62 |
| 2021-06-03 | POL | Gdańsk | 80.7 | 125 | 125 | 128 | 128 | 4 | 160 | 160 | 164 | 164 | 3 | 292 | 3 | 371.35 |
| 2020-11-26 | POL | Bilgoraj | 80.5 | 127 | 127 | 131 | 127 | 4 | 159 | 165 | 165 | 159 | 5 | 286 | 4 | 348.76 |
| 2019-06-21 | POL | Ciechanów | 78.9 | 125 | 128 | 130 | 128 | 4 | 155 | 155 | 164 | 164 | 3 | 292 | 3 | 359.78 |
| 2018-09-28 | POL | Kobierzyce | 76.4 | 128 | 128 | 131 | 128 | 4 | 156 | 160 | 169 | 160 | 2 | 288 | 3 | 360.99 |
| 2018-09-08 | LC | Warszawa | 77.1 | 125 | 130 | 135 | 135 | 0 | 155 | 165 | 165 | 165 | 0 | 300 | 0 | 374.18 |
| 2018-02-24 | LC | Ciechanów | 77.7 | 110 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 145 | 150 | 155 | 150 | 0 | 270 | 0 | 335.37 |
| 2017-11-04 | POL | Zamość | 76.1 | 110 | 115 | 116 | 115 | 7 | 140 | 150 | 155 | 150 | 6 | 265 | 7 | 332.87 |
| 2017-09-09 | LC | Ciechanów | 77.5 | 110 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 135 | 143 | 150 | 143 | 0 | 263 | 0 | 327.13 |
| 2017-06-09 | POL | Zamość | 76.6 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 145 | 153 | 160 | 160 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017-05-20 | LC | Warszawa | 76 | 110 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 140 | 145 | 150 | 150 | 0 | 270 | 0 | 339.4 |
| 2017-03-05 | LC | Ciechanow | 74.8 | 110 | 116 | 120 | 116 | 0 | 140 | 146 | 150 | 146 | 0 | 262 | 0 | 332.25 |
| 2016-10-08 | POL | Warszawa | 76.8 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 3 | 148 | 158 | 158 | 148 | 3 | 268 | 3 | 337.99 |
| 2016-09-10 | LC | Częstochowa | 78.8 | 110 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 0 | 140 | 150 | 155 | 150 | 0 | 270 | 0 | 335.67 |
| 2016-08-27 | LC | Polkowice | 78.5 | 112 | 120 | 0 | 120 | 0 | 140 | 150 | 155 | 150 | 0 | 270 | 0 | 336.38 |
| 2016-06-24 | XX | Częstochowa | 82.8 | 120 | 125 | 125 | 120 | 2 | 145 | 155 | 160 | 155 | 2 | 275 | 2 | 333.01 |
| 2016-05-28 | LC | Lukow | 83.8 | 126 | 130 | 135 | 130 | 0 | 160 | 165 | 166 | 166 | 0 | 296 | 0 | 356.26 |
| 2015-10-17 | POL | Walbrzych | 76.7 | 125 | 130 | 132 | 130 | 5 | 155 | 155 | 161 | 155 | 6 | 285 | 6 | 359.69 |
| 2015-09-18 | LC | Lukow | 77 | 125 | 103 | 130 | 130 | 0 | 150 | 160 | 170 | 160 | 0 | 290 | 0 | 365.2 |
| 2015-09-05 | GP | Puławy | 79.3 | 131 | 135 | 135 | 135 | 8 | 165 | 170 | 170 | 165 | 8 | 300 | 8 | 371.68 |
| 2015-06-20 | LC | Hrubieszów | 78 | 123 | 123 | 127 | 127 | 0 | 155 | 160 | 160 | 155 | 0 | 282 | 0 | 352.57 |
| 2015-05-29 | POL | Ciechanów | 77 | 126 | 126 | 130 | 130 | 2 | 153 | 157 | 158 | 158 | 3 | 288 | 2 | 362.68 |
| 2015-05-09 | LC | Łuków | 81.5 | 125 | 130 | 135 | 130 | 0 | 155 | 162 | 162 | 155 | 0 | 285 | 0 | 347.97 |
| 2014-06-06 | POL | Zamosc | 76.25 | 120 | 123 | 126 | 123 | 3 | 151 | 151 | 151 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014-05-16 | XX | Siedlce | 82 | 110 | 115 | 120 | 120 | 3 | 140 | 145 | 150 | 150 | 3 | 270 | 3 | 328.61 |
| 2013-04-12 | POL | Bydgoszcz | 75.2 | 124 | 127 | 127 | 124 | 2 | 152 | 158 | 158 | 152 | 3 | 276 | 3 | 352.3 |
| 2012-07-12 | POL | Muszyna | 67.6 | 105 | 105 | 105 | 105 | 4 | 125 | 127 | 133 | 127 | 4 | 232 | 4 | 314.58 |
| 2012-05-25 | POL | Zakliczyn | 69 | 95 | 100 | 105 | 105 | 8 | 120 | 125 | 130 | 125 | 13 | 230 | 9 | 307.82 |
| 2011-10-28 | POL | Hrubieszow | 67.5 | 100 | 102 | 102 | 100 | 7 | 115 | 120 | 121 | 121 | 7 | 221 | 7 | 299.95 |
| 2011-04-29 | POL | Ciechanow | 61.6 | 83 | 83 | 86 | 83 | 8 | 100 | 103 | 105 | 103 | 9 | 186 | 8 | 268.56 |